Re: Review of draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp WG ITEM?

Hi Lawrence et al.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, lconroy wrote:

> However, I'd hate to see 3761bis and the guide held up too long either.
>
> IMHO, the Guide is pretty close to complete.
> The only real question is whether or not we need to do a refreshed
> "X- guide" soon. Either way, I think the "main" guide is ready to roll.

We jmade clear in Service Guide [draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-09], 
that Service Guide is only about "regular" Enumservice registrations, and 
therefore does not include "X-" registrations.

As you know, "X-" registrations are handled in a separate document 
<draft-ietf-enum-x-service-regs>, which does neither hold up RFC3761bis 
nor Service Guide. I'll update (or rather completely rewrite) it soon as 
Service Guide seems to be pretty stable by now.

cheers,
  Bernie