Re: Scheduling Enum WG meeting Dublin (was Re: Review of draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp WG ITEM?)

>  
>  Hi Rich
>  
>  On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Richard Shockey wrote:
>  
>  > It would make Dublin a lot easier to schedule. I'm terribly
>  reluctant to go
>  > for 2 hours since we have enough contentious issues to discuss and
>  RAI will
>  > be packed as usual.  I think we need to do our duty here and push
>  out
>  > 3761bis and the Registration document to WGLC ASAP.
>  
>  I am a bit worried about having to tight schedule during the ENUM WG
>  meeting in Dublin. As the new topics might eat time we need to
>  finalize
>  Service Guide and RFC3761bis. I really hope we can get both documents
>  done
>  within the next weeks.

So what are we waiting for .. again .. are we done yet?   Should I issue
WGLC for 3761bis .. no one wants to answer the question.

>  
>  Also bear in mind, that Dublin might be the last meeting I can attend
>  personally. I'll change my employer by the beginning of July and it is
>  rather unsure, whether or not I will be able to participate IETF
>  meetings
>  in future.
>  
>  > Is it appropriate to run the Registration document through David
>  Conrad of
>  > IANA for comments?
>  
>  Good idea! Who is taking care (i.e. holder of the Action Point) about
>  this
>  step? Author(s) or chair(s)?


You are nominated seconded and confirmed ... I've added Dave to the thread
... 


>  
>  cheers,
>    Bernie
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum