Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

[email protected] wrote:

> I've made specific allowance for an absolute form of the Send-N record 
> which *is* compatible with wildcard records.

Yes, but it's still possible to break wild cards:

> 7.2.  DNS Wildcards
> 
>    The relative form of these records SHOULD NOT be used with DNS
>    wildcards since DNS wildcards can represent an arbitrary number of
>    labels (or digits, in the ENUM case) and the data in a relative form
>    'Send-N' record is specific to an exact position in the ENUM tree.

and if there is anything I've learnt, when ever you give someone enough
rope they'll surely hang themselves sooner rather than later.

I fail to see why your use for DNS should take precedence over existing
DNS types at all, this will only lead to disparity between countries, I
find the idea of databasing this information useful, but don't break
existing systems to achieve it.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane