Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

I still have my objection to the basic notion that the base enum query is
the right way to determine how many digits are needed to route.  I think
that information is static, and we need a standardized way to find it out,
and send-n is not the right way to do that.  I think overlapped dialing is
going away, and devices need to be told how many digits to collect before
pressing "SEND" or the equivalent. 

Brian



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:26 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Enum] Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
> 
> I've just submitted draft-bellis-send-n-02 and it's available now online
> at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02
> 
> Could those who commented so vigourously on the -00 draft and then failed
> to make any comment at all on -01 please take a look at this one and
> comment now so that we don't have to spend too long over it in Dublin?
> 
> The changes over -01 are relatively minor - mostly there were some small
> editorial nits and I've rewritten some of the text to make it a little
> clearer about the possible uses for this data.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Ray
> 
> --
> Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon)
> Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
> e: [email protected], t: +44 1865 332211
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum