Re: wildcards and n-send NAPTRs
Jim Reid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 26 Jun 2008, at 10:42, Roy Arends wrote: > I'd like us to .... come up with proper technical arguments. OK Roy. Could the proponents of n-send please explain why the semantics of wildcarding have to undergo further complication by making them conditional on the RDATA of an existing resource record? Not ony that, they're conditional on a subtype of the RDATA. This goes to the core of the stability of the DNS protocol. It's incumbent on those proposing this change to explain that it won't break anything or require yet more corner cases in wildcard handling/processing by servers, resolvers and end applications. Saying "we're doing this in private between consenting adults" is not an answer. Saying n-send SHOULD NOT use wildcards is all very well. But what if someone does do that? Even behind closed doors? What operational impact would that have? What sort of action would those DNS implementations need to take? Will it require extra code? If so, where?