Re: switches and send-n NAPTRs
"Clive D.W. Feather" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jim Reid said: >> The particular application where this has real use is standard POTS phones >> sending DTMF into a switch that uses ENUM-like technology to route the >> call onwards. > Eh? Why would such a beast need send-n NAPTRs? To determine how many digits to collect before querying the database again. See section 1 of the I-D. > Where are the > requirements and how can this WG assess whether send-n meets those > requirements? The requirements are explained in section 1 of the I-D, particularly paragraphs 2 and 3. > I would have assumed switches would have a priori > knowledge of the prevailing numbering/routing plan irrespective of > whether they used ENUM-like technology. To the best of my knowledge, *NOBODY* has a priori knowledge of the whole UK numbering/routeing plan. This explicitly includes the Regulator. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[email protected]> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <[email protected]> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |