Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues
"Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No. Send-n can't necessarily tell you that unless the ENUM tree is provisioned with each separate number. Real systems don't necessarily do that. Many, including ours, lets you provision a range of numbers, and you won't be able to tell if the number is actually valid unless you try it. That is what I meant. The information on number length is not equivalent to working number, and never could be. Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Daley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 6:29 AM > To: Brian Rosen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Enum] Send-n, rat holes and real issues > > Here's a much simpler way of putting it: > > Your proposal can tell whether there *could be* a number of a particular > length, send-n can tell whether there *is* a number of a particular > length. > > send-n is only about one tree, your proposal may cover multiple trees. > > These are two very different, but complementary, requirements. > > Jay