Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues

"Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
No.

Send-n can't necessarily tell you that unless the ENUM tree is provisioned
with each separate number.  Real systems don't necessarily do that.  Many,
including ours, lets you provision a range of numbers, and you won't be able
to tell if the number is actually valid unless you try it.  That is what I
meant.  The information on number length is not equivalent to working
number, and never could be.  

Brian



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Daley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 6:29 AM
> To: Brian Rosen
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Enum] Send-n, rat holes and real issues
> 
> Here's a much simpler way of putting it:
> 
> Your proposal can tell whether there *could be* a number of a particular
> length, send-n can tell whether there *is* a number of a particular
> length.
> 
> send-n is only about one tree, your proposal may cover multiple trees.
> 
> These are two very different, but complementary, requirements.
> 
> Jay
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.