Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF03BB5EEF.DD4D5EBF-ON80257480.003C1CF5-80257480.003CBD36@nominet.org.uk> |
> Can someone in the UK doing send-n please give us a rough idea of the > ratio of known and unknown rather than everyone keep speculating over > the scale of this. As far as I know the UK regulator does actually have a very good idea of the number lengths, although the published information isn't always 100% up-to-date. The UK issue is the very large size of the prefix->length table, and the need to accurately maintain it in every switch in the UK telephone network. Currently a mixture of static tables and ISUP SND is used, but with NGN interconnect over IP coming soon the latter method won't be available. Ray