Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues

Rosbotham, Paul wrote:

> I note that both S8 and S9 have rows with no entry in the Notes
> field.  I would assume that these are 10 digits long, but this is an
> assumption.  Perhaps this re-inforces that getting the data is a
> non-trivial activity?

Actually S7 doesn't either. Does anyone have a better/more accurate
source of information?

Based on the information at hand most routes seems to be 10 digits
except for S8 which has 9 and 7 digit numbers listed as well.

If the missing information means 10 digits it would be pretty trivial to
collate this information, however that would be guessing and someone
should have this information published somewhere especially if someone
is planning to put it into send-n, or is the information going into
send-n guesses too?

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane