Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues

> What you're looking at is the supposedly authoritative source of data.
> Better info can be found, but only by talking to the individual CPs...of
> which there are currently 384, off the top of my head.  That's what we're
> trying to get away from.
> 
> The point of Send-N is that the records are set according to what's
> populated into ENUM.
And how does the ENUM operator get the data?  It needs to get data from 384
CPs, plus the regulator, right?  If the ENUM database was a world-wide
database, it has to get the data from thousands of sources in different
countries, right?

Doesn't that imply some sort of standardization?

And then, having standardized a way to get the data, why is that not good
enough for everyone?