Re: Send-n, rat holes and real issues
Duane <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rosbotham, Paul wrote:
> your analysis is interesting. HOWEVER as a telephony provider, I don't have the luxury of maintaining data that will cope with the "majority" of calls. I have to cope with all of them hence do need to go to that next level of detail (or use timers...typically for level 0/1 in Australia we do that).
No there is nothing about length so timers wouldn't come into it, the
only difference is if the number is allocated or not.
--
Best regards,
Duane
http://www.freeauth.org - Enterprise Two Factor Authentication
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://e164.org - Global Communication for the 21st Century
"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
but the optimist has a better time on the trip."
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIdy/bEpWoZMmo/c8RAn9+AKCIQTSoR+BbkMDksXtNJ4cqzvqIGACg171E M0iaOXJze/Q9FX29UpEemoc= =Qxo1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----