Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:55:15 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Hi Duane, folks,
  I know it's friday afternoon, but is it strictly necessary to re-write
DNS (by requiring new pseudo-opts in DNS messages) to do Number Port?
First we have ANY, now we have new pseudo-opts.
Please consider the LEAST change that will work efficiently *first*,
not jump straight to something that needs the world to change.

all the best,
   Lawrence
[envious, as he obviously hasn't had the same number of beers at  
lunch :]

On 18 Jul 2008, at 12:11, Duane wrote:
> what exactly is wrong
> with returning this information as either a pseudo RR like EDNS0 or
> something to that effect?