Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
"Clive D.W. Feather" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lawrence Conroy said: > Thus for that [common] case, there is NO DNS QUERY OVERHEAD at all. > That feature is more than good - it's crucial if this is deployed > in a real telecom net. DNS scales, but elapsed time is still important. Right. > I am puzzled, however, by this long and peregrinating thread. > There is one question that seems to have been missed - does this need > to be an E2U NAPTR, or instead could it use another DDDS Application > (i.e. use a different collision-avoidance string)? I don't see any particular thing that requires E2U. > So... what's wrong with moving this (and maybe other PSTN-internal > meta-information specifications) into their own DDDS Application? Apart from the amount of I-D writing, nothing that I can see. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[email protected]> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <[email protected]> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |