Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

Jay Daley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <OF89165371.25A75BE1-ON8025748C.006BE4F2-8025748C.006C5D53@nominet.org.uk>
Duane wrote on 20/07/2008 05:19:20:

> If you aren't going to pre-populate a DNS database (like BIND) then
> where is the issue with sticking it under some other RR type?

1.  Because we only need it for ENUM.

2.  Because the hierarchy of ownership of labels for ENUM is completely 
different from the hierarchy for ordinary DNS and in ordinary DNS it is 
not acceptable for the owner of one label to make authoritative statements 
about a lower label under different ownership.

Not to mention the fact that this is the wrong place to discuss this - 
DNSEXT is the place for a new general RR.

Jay
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.