Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
Jay Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF89165371.25A75BE1-ON8025748C.006BE4F2-8025748C.006C5D53@nominet.org.uk> |
Duane wrote on 20/07/2008 05:19:20: > If you aren't going to pre-populate a DNS database (like BIND) then > where is the issue with sticking it under some other RR type? 1. Because we only need it for ENUM. 2. Because the hierarchy of ownership of labels for ENUM is completely different from the hierarchy for ordinary DNS and in ordinary DNS it is not acceptable for the owner of one label to make authoritative statements about a lower label under different ownership. Not to mention the fact that this is the wrong place to discuss this - DNSEXT is the place for a new general RR. Jay