Re: Enumservices Guide - Road map

"Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CBFC8@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
I will review it again, having been away from the draft since Philadelphia.  I will also go through all the open tickets.

Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Alexander Mayrhofer
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Enum] Enumservices Guide - Road map
> 
> 
> Fellow WG members,
> 
> as you know one of the major remaining items of the WG work 
> is the Enumservices Guide. We believe that this document is 
> mature enough to go into Lurking err.. Working Group Last 
> Call (probably during or right after the Dublin meeting) - 
> it's likely not perfect, but the amount of feedback we 
> receive indicates the WG is happy with it as it is.
> 
> What we'd like to do is the following:
> 
> 
> - Can you please do an in-depth review of the current draft 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-10.txt).
> We'd appreciate if that review can be performed asap. Before 
> we have three (3) persons that have told us they have done 
> such a review we will not move the draft forward.
> 
> - We've a list of open tickets/issues at
> http://ietf.enum.at/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/report/1 - We need 
> someone that can go through them with "fresh eyes" and 
> provide feedback on them (and yes, we know that there are 
> some smaller and larger chunks).
> If you do, please let us know. We need at least one (1) 
> person that have gone through the list in detail before we 
> really trust the data.
> 
> - Even though we've asked IANA for early feedback a while 
> ago, all we got by now is a ticket number. We know this is a 
> bit frustrating for all of us, but we won't receive any 
> feedback until very late in the publication process. If 
> anybody feels capable of doing a review from 
> IANA-perspective, we'd definitely appreciate that. We are 
> continuing our discussion with IANA.
> 
> - We'd also like to know whether anybody thinks that document 
> is _NOT_ ready to go to WGLC.
> 
> 
> Patrik Fältström (WG chair)
> Richard Shockey (WG chair)
> Bernie Höneisen (Editor)
> Alex Mayrhofer (Editor)
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.