Re: a new RRype instead of send-n NAPTRs

> Of course (separate debate on this thread) there's the issue of 
> whether we're talking about usage of Send-N for a specific quasi-
> private ENUM instance, or the public e164.arpa one.  I believe Ray's
> intent was to leverage the thinking for utilisation in the latter. 

Not at all - I'm thinking more of international level interconnects 
between (private) I-ENUM trees used for different countries' NGNs.

Ray