Re: Enumservices Guide - Road map

As we agreed in the WG meeting .. we will not attempt a WGLC until at least
Sept 1.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>  Of Livingood, Jason
>  Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:40 PM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] Enumservices Guide - Road map
>  
>  By the way, for those of you who will be performing pre-WGLC reviews,
>  please wait about a week until we publish a -11 version.  We're
>  working on closing tickets out now, and making a number of (relatively
>  minor) changes to the -10 version of the document.
>  
>  
>  Thanks
>  Jason
>  
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>  > Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
>  > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:44 PM
>  > To: Alexander Mayrhofer; [email protected]
>  > Subject: Re: [Enum] Enumservices Guide - Road map
>  >
>  > I will review it again, having been away from the draft since
>  > Philadelphia.  I will also go through all the open tickets.
>  >
>  > Jason
>  >
>  > > -----Original Message-----
>  > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>  > On Behalf
>  > > Of Alexander Mayrhofer
>  > > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:13 AM
>  > > To: [email protected]
>  > > Subject: [Enum] Enumservices Guide - Road map
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Fellow WG members,
>  > >
>  > > as you know one of the major remaining items of the WG work is the
>  > > Enumservices Guide. We believe that this document is mature
>  > enough to
>  > > go into Lurking err.. Working Group Last Call (probably during or
>  > > right after the Dublin meeting) - it's likely not perfect, but the
>  > > amount of feedback we receive indicates the WG is happy
>  > with it as it
>  > > is.
>  > >
>  > > What we'd like to do is the following:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > - Can you please do an in-depth review of the current draft
>  > >
>  > (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-
>  10.txt).
>  > > We'd appreciate if that review can be performed asap.
>  > Before we have
>  > > three (3) persons that have told us they have done such a review
>  we
>  > > will not move the draft forward.
>  > >
>  > > - We've a list of open tickets/issues at
>  > > http://ietf.enum.at/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/report/1 - We need
>  > someone that
>  > > can go through them with "fresh eyes" and provide feedback on them
>  > > (and yes, we know that there are some smaller and larger chunks).
>  > > If you do, please let us know. We need at least one (1) person
>  that
>  > > have gone through the list in detail before we really trust
>  > the data.
>  > >
>  > > - Even though we've asked IANA for early feedback a while
>  > ago, all we
>  > > got by now is a ticket number. We know this is a bit
>  > frustrating for
>  > > all of us, but we won't receive any feedback until very late in
>  the
>  > > publication process. If anybody feels capable of doing a
>  > review from
>  > > IANA-perspective, we'd definitely appreciate that. We are
>  > continuing
>  > > our discussion with IANA.
>  > >
>  > > - We'd also like to know whether anybody thinks that
>  > document is _NOT_
>  > > ready to go to WGLC.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > Patrik Fältström (WG chair)
>  > > Richard Shockey (WG chair)
>  > > Bernie Höneisen (Editor)
>  > > Alex Mayrhofer (Editor)
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > enum mailing list
>  > > [email protected]
>  > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>  > >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > enum mailing list
>  > [email protected]
>  > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>  >
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum