Re: Working Group Last Call on enumservices guide 12

I stand corrected ..thanks for point that out

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>  Of Peter Koch
>  Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:05 PM
>  To: IETF ENUM WG
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] Working Group Last Call on enumservices guide 12
>  
>  Richard,
>  
>  > Peter ... why the change to BCP vs Proposed Standard. I think this
>  is
>  > exactly the kind of draft that requires PS.
>  
>  the draft "IANA Registration of Enumservices: Guide, Template and IANA
>  Considerations" doesn't specify a protocol but a process.
>  
>  Both RFC 2026, section 5, and section 4.3 of RFC 5226 suggest that
>  process
>  documents, and IANA Guidelines in particular, usually are published as
>  BCP
>  RFCs.  Also, there's little to implement independently in this draft
>  that
>  could help advance it on the Standards Track.
>  
>  -Peter
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum