Re: [IANA #197380] No IANA feedback for draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-12 received
<[email protected]> Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:15:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Michelle Thanks for your answer. To summarize, in Ticket [IANA #171390] there are basically two open issues: 1) How should the specification look, if an IANA Registry is in XML? 2) Is the process as currently described in draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-12 suitable for IANA? (We made some major changes since our talk in Dublin.) We would appreciate your answer to these two questions by the end of this week. cheers, Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Michelle Cotton via RT [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 8:02 PM To: Hoeneisen Bernhard, SCS-NIT-DEV-PDI-ACE-INV; [email protected] Subject: [IANA #197380] No IANA feedback for draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-12 received Bernie, I will see if it will be possible to have the XML format for enumservices ready by the end of this week. I will let you know by Friday. As you mention in your message to the ENUM WG, if need be we can have it in the old format and we will convert the registry at a later time. Thank you for your patience. Look for a message from me by Friday. Michelle Cotton IANA On Tue Sep 30 21:19:56 2008, [email protected] wrote: > Dear ENUM WG > > In Dublin we have been asked to use the new XMLized policy for IANA > registrations of Enumservices. According to my knowledge, there is > neither documentation nor an example on how this is done. > > I have sent IANA a draft proposal containing an XML schema and asked > for guidance on how a specification for an XML Registry should look > like. I also stressed out the fact that the document was in WG LC. > > Result: So far, no answer at all :-( > > Does anybody have direct connections to IANA and could remind them to > resolv the issues collected in ticket [IANA #171390] ASAP? > > I there is no answer from IANA by the end of this week, we'll go on > with the old-style IANA Registry for Enumservices (i.e. forget about > XML Registry). > Does anybody have an issue with this approach? Any better proposals on > how to get out of this lock? > > cheers, > Bernie > >