Re: What issues do we need to cover/finalize in Minneapolis?

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Jim Reid [mailto:[email protected]]
>  Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:09 PM
>  To: Richard Shockey
>  Cc: [email protected]; 'Patrik Fältström'
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] What issues do we need to cover/finalize in
>  Minneapolis?
>  
>  On Oct 15, 2008, at 18:34, Richard Shockey wrote:
>  
>  > I have a one hour slot allocated on Friday..but do we even need it?
>  
>  I suppose it depends on whether we have that process for registering
>  service types or not, and how well things have progressed with IANA.

Well so far so good. I cant imagine an issue that would require face to face
consensus here.

>  
>  Also, what's happening about send-n and the other bits and bobs that
>  seem to be clustering around a new DDDS spec? Is this for the enum WG
>  or somewhere else?

Well that’s why I'm asking the question.  The issue of send-n and UNUSED are
un-resolved. 

SOURCE URI is probably out of scope for ENUM at this time