Re: What issues do we need to cover/finalize in Minneapolis? Agenda items ??

OK ... I'm convinced ... if we have relevant agenda items please forward
them to the chairs so we can process started.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>  Of Peter Koch
>  Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:44 PM
>  To: IETF ENUM WG
>  Subject: Re: [Enum] What issues do we need to cover/finalize in
>  Minneapolis?
>  
>  On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:34:12PM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>  >
>  > I have a one hour slot allocated on Friday..but do we even need it?
>  
>  my impression in Dublin was that we were rather short of time.  While
>  there are mostly procedural and organizational questions left, I'm
>  pretty sure we can usefully fill at least this one hour.
>  
>  There's the question of "beta testing" the Enumservices guidlines,
>  minor remaining tweaks to the draft itself as well as dealing with
>  x-services. Also a summary and status discussion for a couple of the
>  documents marked as 'active' or 'in iesg review' could be helpful
>  for the WG to be able to agree on a schedule for winding down.
>  
>  Also, I'm tempted to propose a moratorium for adopting new or modified
>  Enumservices.
>  
>  -Peter
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum