draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00 RESTART

Don Troshynski <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:40:55 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC31518DF8C2E@mail>
Seems like a day to bring up old drafts, so here goes...

Where do we stand on draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00?  Is there any interest in updating this draft and moving it forward?  This would also make a great way to convey trunk group information as part of the query (and, of course, anything else that can be placed into a URI).  If there is consideration of an Informational or BCP on trunk groups in ENUM, this concept should be acknowledged, as well.  I also think it would be a good idea make the URI concept generic (not explicitly define it to be the source), and maybe extend the definition to include the header name(s).

Thoughts?

Don

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum