draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00 RESTART
Don Troshynski <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:40:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC31518DF8C2E@mail> |
Seems like a day to bring up old drafts, so here goes... Where do we stand on draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00? Is there any interest in updating this draft and moving it forward? This would also make a great way to convey trunk group information as part of the query (and, of course, anything else that can be placed into a URI). If there is consideration of an Informational or BCP on trunk groups in ENUM, this concept should be acknowledged, as well. I also think it would be a good idea make the URI concept generic (not explicitly define it to be the source), and maybe extend the definition to include the header name(s). Thoughts? Don _______________________________________________ enum mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum