Re: Meeting [Re: Trunk group document & Charter]

What would we do in Stockholm? What would be the agenda?

I can't imagine asking the AD for a slot given there is very little to
discuss unless there are large objections to 3761bis and the registration
draft. 

Cullen and Bob are cooperating by getting the last items off the table.
There is the CNAM draft but that that is a separate issue involving what is
the URI type. The WG already approved it.

We did hum on trunkgroup as a WG item ..I think it was Philadelphia I just
need to find the note from the various meeting minutes.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>  Of Peter Koch
>  Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:24 PM
>  To: Lawrence Conroy
>  Cc: IETF ENUM WG
>  Subject: [Enum] Meeting [Re: Trunk group document & Charter]
>  
>  On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:11:22PM +0100, Lawrence Conroy wrote:
>  
>  > I didn't see any mail to that effect on list. As we haven't HAD a
>  > WG meeting since this change in the document, there has been no
>  > chance for them to mention this agreement there either.
>  
>  speaking of which -- are we going to have a session in Stockholm to do
>  the
>  final WG cleanup?
>  
>  -Peter
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum