Re: Meeting [Re: Trunk group document & Charter]

>  On Tue, 26 May 2009, Richard Shockey wrote:
>  
>  > What would we do in Stockholm? What would be the agenda?
>  
>  Some topics that come into my mind and might be worth discussing:
>  
>  - Status of "unused"?

Does anyone care?

>  
>  - What to do about the milestone:
>     "ENUM Privacy and Security Considerations as an Informational"?


Another one of mine. Died due to lack of interest.


>  
>  - What should be the proper home of Trunk Group?
>     ENUM or SPEERMINT, or let DISPATCH decide on a new home?

A meeting to decide this???? 

>  
>  - Where will ENUM issues be handled after closure of the ENUM WG?

That is a AD issue ...the list remains open no matter what.

>  
>  - more...?
>  
>  
>  > We did hum on trunkgroup as a WG item ..I think it was Philadelphia
>  I just
>  > need to find the note from the various meeting minutes.
>  
>  1) The WG has never approved the currently discussed variant
>  
>  2) In any case such work requires AD approval, as the ENUM charter
>  says:
>  
>        Other than Enumservices, all proposed deliverables of the
>  working
>        group will be discussed with and approved by the Area Directors
>  
>      I am not aware of any AD approval.

We'll hear from them shortly.

>  
>  
>  cheers,
>    Bernie