Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-hoeneisen-e164-to-metadata-00.txt First Comment
[email protected] Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:11:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFF21DFFD7.7FA2F2AD-ON8025764E.00276F9F-8025764E.00278279@nominet.org.uk> |
> Co-Chair hat off. > > For what it's worth I'm all for it. It would certainly solve a lot of > problems I've had with the solution for CNAM. It would be trivial and > extremely easy to implement for any number of PSTN parameters that are not > functionally considered "routing data" that normally would be excluded from > tel: uri's. I could certainly use it - it would be perfect for my Send-N draft. Ray _______________________________________________ enum mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum