Re: Review: draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt

Hi Gonzalo

Thanks for your AD feedback on 
draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt. We have addressed your
feedback and submitted a new revision (-05) to the repository. We believe 
that all issues have been resolved
in -05.

cheers,
  Bernie

PS: A revision of enumservice-guide is expected to follow shortly.


On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:

> Hi,
>
> please, find below my comments on the enumservices transition draft. As
> soon as these comments are addressed, I will get the IESG as a whole to
> review the draft.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> Review: draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt
>
> Abstracts should not contain references. Please, remove the reference to
> RFC 3761 from it (it is OK to mention the RFC without the reference,
> though).
>
> Section 3 talks about the current policy being "Expert Review" and
> "Specification Required". Per my comments on the enumservices-guide
> document, this will have to be updated to point to a single IANA policy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>