Re: Review: draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt

Hi Bernie,

thanks for addressing my comments.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 24/04/2010 3:05 PM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo
> 
> Thanks for your AD feedback on 
> draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt. We have addressed your 
> feedback and submitted a new revision (-05) to the repository. We believe 
> that all issues have been resolved in -05.
> 
> cheers,
>   Bernie
> 
> PS: A revision of enumservice-guide is expected to follow shortly.
> 
> 
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> please, find below my comments on the enumservices transition draft. As
>> soon as these comments are addressed, I will get the IESG as a whole to
>> review the draft.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> Review: draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-transition-04.txt
>>
>> Abstracts should not contain references. Please, remove the reference to
>> RFC 3761 from it (it is OK to mention the RFC without the reference,
>> though).
>>
>> Section 3 talks about the current policy being "Expert Review" and
>> "Specification Required". Per my comments on the enumservices-guide
>> document, this will have to be updated to point to a single IANA policy.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> enum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>>
>