Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem statement

So ... all in favor of re chartering the ENUM WG ..please hum on this list
or the ENUM WG list now attached.

Its time to force the issue. This is important work ultimately central to
making SIP work better. Stall and delay is not a rational option here. SIP
Service providers and IMS providers want clarity and direction on where the
technical standards are moving, if at all. If the IETF doesn't do this it
will be done privately and without proper community and peer review. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray
Bellis
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:39 PM
To: Dean Willis
Cc: E.164 To MetaData BOF discussion list
Subject: Re: [e2md] Dean's Proxy-Shill Version of the Problem statement


> Are the rest of the sentences true and consistent with the work we've
proposed
> to do?

They're consistent with the approach in Bernie's draft.

However on the last call the it was proposed that it might be a good
idea to simply reboot the ENUM WG.  In another message Richard has shown
that much (if not all) of what we want to do is _already_ within charter.

[[[
I first proposed E2M during the Dublin IETF, as a way to mitigate concerns
that a particular ex-AD had over use of E2U for "non-communications data".
AFAICR he was OK with this proposal, which then laid dormant until Bernie
wrote it up.

For my own Send-N draft, my plan had actually been to simply wait for the
ENUM Services Guide draft to become an RFC, and the re-file under the expert
review process.
]]]

Ray

_______________________________________________
e2md mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/e2md