Re: Section 1.2 & 2 of 3761bis

On 19 maj 2010, at 11.06, Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]>  
wrote:

> Section 2 on the other hand makes it practically impossible to use  
> ENUM with non-E.164 numbering plans:
>
>  To mitigate this risk, the "E2U" token MUST NOT
>  provisioned in domains associated with non-E.164 numbers.

It all depends on what we mean by ENUM. We do not agree if ENUM stands  
only for the technology (look things up in dns, given some root) or  
only when the root is e164.arpa.

I thought we had this discussion in the enum wg, and concluded that  
enum (without any prefix or suffix) always implies use of e164.arpa.

Other things are called infrastructure enum, enum-like, use of enum  
technology, private enum or such.

Which I think is what the text quoted says.

    Patrik