Re: Section 1.2 & 2 of 3761bis

Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> Thu, 20 May 2010 06:49:03 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 20 maj 2010, at 00.57, Lawrence Conroy wrote:

> I also think this paragraph is broken in other ways; it conflates ENUM domains (i.e. input is an E.164 number, key is within the e164.arpa apex) with E2U NAPTRs, dialling plans with number plans, and diallable numbers with assigned numbers in a number plan, and ...)
> 
> Comments?

It is an example, and it says it is possible to have E2U NAPTR in other domains, which is true.

Examples are non-normative.

I do not see any problems with the text.

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed