On the issue of G-SPN's

Though the use case for a G-SPN has been identified by this list and is on
the TWKI, I want to make it abundantly clear that I do not believe that ENUM
or a E2MD WG should actually define what is the appropriate namespace for
G-SPN's.

 

It is a requirement for DRINKS ( by ITU liaison) and touches on SPEERMINT (
which IMHO should shut down ). Consequently the logical thing to do is a
individual submission. 

 

I've offered to try and rough cut a Use Case and Requirements document,
which I will do in the not to distant future in collaboration with several
others who have offered to help. 

 

Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting
Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum
PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683
< <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> mailto:richard(at)shockey.us>
skype: rshockey101
LinkedIn :  <http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/rshockey101
http//www.sipforum.org

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum