Re: Way forward after the ENUM trilogy
"Richard Shockey" <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:10:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00b101cb50fa$556a0a50$003e1ef0$@us> |
+1 This is a sensible plan and I have no objections to it. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 8:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Enum] Way forward after the ENUM trilogy Hi, as you know, we are currently focusing on getting the ENUM trilogy approved. In addition to the ENUM trilogy, there are a number of ENUM drafts. This is how we intend to handle them: draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00 This draft will be abandoned because a DNSEXT document already provides the same functionality. draft-ietf-enum-iax-05 This draft will be updated to comply with enumservices-guide as soon as enumservices-guide is approved. draft-ietf-enum-cnam-08 draft-ietf-enum-unused-04 The ENUM WG will not work on these drafts any longer because the issues these drafts deal with are being discussed in a wider context within the E2MD initiative. We would like to update the milestones in the charter according to this plan. Your input on this plan is very welcome. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ enum mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum