Re: Feedback by 2010-09-24 (was: Way forward after the ENUM trilogy)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Peter Koch
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:57 PM
To: Bernie Hoeneisen
Cc: IETF ENUM list
Subject: Re: [Enum] Feedback by 2010-09-24 (was: Way forward after the ENUM
trilogy)

Bernie, WG,

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

> Our shephering AD has just made a proposal on how to proceed with the ENUM

> WG documents that are residing in the publication queue after the 3 main 
> ENUM WG documents (the ENUM Trilogy) will have been approved (see below).

Gonzalo> We would like to update the milestones in the charter according to
this
Gonzalo> plan. Your input on this plan is very welcome.

isn't this a lot of prose to describe the empty set? In other words, can
we expect the WG to be closed after victory will have been declared?


RS> I certainly hope so .. I see no reason why the WG should remain open
after the trilogy is approved by the IESG. We're done .


> draft-ietf-enum-iax-05
>   This draft will be updated to comply with enumservices-guide as soon
>   as enumservices-guide is approved.

No objection to any part of the plan, just to remark that with the new
registration guidelines there's no real need for a WG document anymore.
That is, this one does not have to extend the wg's lifetime, even if it gets
published later.

We can now start talking about an ENUM Operations WG.

-Peter (only half kidding)


RS> Well there are enough private ENUM systems out there to almost justify
it ... ( only half kidding as well)