Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-21.txt

Hi,

I will discuss this with the IESG and let you know how to proceed.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 15/09/2010 1:09 AM, Peter Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 08:52:48AM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>> Gonzalo is correct.  Fat thumb error. No conspiracy intended. Logically
>> given the subject matter it's a PS.
> 
> assuming that _this_ was now exactly that type of error :-), I'd like to
> point to <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum/current/msg06548.html>
> and surrounding messages. In that discussion we concluded BCP was the
> appropriate status.  Please understand, PS would not provide "more value"
> than BCP, but both categories just have different functions.
> 
> Best regards,
>    Peter