Re: Way forward after the ENUM trilogy

Hi,

FYI: per the discussion below, I have just moved the edns0, cnam, and
unused drafts to the "dead" state.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 10/09/2010 3:56 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as you know, we are currently focusing on getting the ENUM trilogy
> approved. In addition to the ENUM trilogy, there are a number of ENUM
> drafts. This is how we intend to handle them:
> 
> draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00
>   This draft will be abandoned because a DNSEXT document already
>   provides the same functionality.
> 
> draft-ietf-enum-iax-05
>   This draft will be updated to comply with enumservices-guide as soon
>   as enumservices-guide is approved.
> 
> draft-ietf-enum-cnam-08
> draft-ietf-enum-unused-04
>   The ENUM WG will not work on these drafts any longer because the
>   issues these drafts deal with are being discussed in a wider context
>   within the E2MD initiative.
> 
> 
> We would like to update the milestones in the charter according to this
> plan. Your input on this plan is very welcome.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>