Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.txt

Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:00:08 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Laurent-Walter, Richard, folks,
 As one of the authors of RFC6116, I'm intrigued with section 4 of this draft.

AFAICT, section 4 of this draft specifically states that E2U+acct can be used in an entirely different namespace from ENUM. That's an interpretation of 6116 section 2 that I don't recognise.

The second paragraph of Section 5 is ambivalent on this, but section 4 spells out that a separate apex may be used.
That directly contradicts its example, and in any case the Enumservice template is incorrect for such private use (in that case, it would need to be "limited", not "common" -- see RFC6117 section 5.2.7 **).
=> Was that intended -- does that first paragraph of section 4 of this draft help?

As I understand the second paragraph of section 4, the intention is that an implementation will chase pstn:tel records looking for a domain with an appropriate E2U+acct record. That looks like it's stretching the pstn:tel use given in RFC4769 section 3.1, but ...

The last bullet of section 5.5 of RFC6117 states that the registration doc needs to cover loop mitigation.
It may be unfair, but RFC4769 was not covered by the current rules, so they dodged the bullet of that requirement.
This draft can't, so you will have to spell out the rules for loop mitigation.
Merely referring to RFC4694 is not enough; see the last sentence of section 5 of RFC4694.

Finally, section 5 mentions an "activity wall". I wonder if anyone will know what that means in 10 years time.
It is not mentioned directly in the webfinger draft, so if it's spelt out in the referenced OMA service document, from where can one get that spec?

all the best,
  Lawrence
** [E2U+pstn:tel was registered under the "old" rules; this one is covered by 6117]


On 2 Mar 2012, at 21:08, Richard Shockey wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 10:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> 
> 	Title           : ENUM Service Registration for Social Networking
> (SN) Services
> 	Author(s)       : Laurent-Walter Goix
>                          Kepeng Li
> 	Filename        : draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 7
> 	Date            : 2012-03-02
> 
>   This document registers a Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) service for
>   Social Networking (SN).  Specifically, this document focuses on
>   provisioning 'acct:' URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers) in ENUM.
> 
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.tx
> t
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-goix-appsawg-enum-sn-service-00.txt