RE: Draft EOS minutes

"Harrington, David" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.eos
Message-ID <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA0757E0@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com>
Hi Tom,
 
I'm a bit confused about your suggestion. Maybe you can reword so I can
understand your point.
 
PDUs don't really deliver notifications. Messages deliver PDUs. PDUs may
contain notifications.
 
Are you asking that each message be identified? That information is already
available by checking the source address in the UDP packet. The message
header includes a request ID, so duplicates can be detected. Snmpv3
supplements this with the contextEngineID to identify the engine that
sourced the PDU.
 
Am I misunderstanding your question?
 
dbh

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Petch [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:24 PM
To: Glenn Waters; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Draft EOS minutes


Following the work in Disman has highlighted a number of difficulties with
the basic technology of SNMP but as has been pointed out to me, most of
those are Mib-related,not SNMP-the-protocol-related.
 
But one that I see as SNMP (sensu stricto) and hence a possibility for this
group, is the difficulty of identifying a PDU (as opposed to identifying a
MIB object at which SNMP is very good).  Sometimes it matters to know where
information came from eg which PDU delivered the Notification so as to
track/correlate/eliminate duplicates etc.
 
As defined, SNMP does not seem to have any reliable way of doing so; any
ideas?
 
 
Tom Petch
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.