Re: Call for censensus on path forward
"David T. Perkins" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
HI, Well, reading between the lines and making a few assumptions... 1) Wes and I both agree that any proposal MUST work with the existing SMI 2) Wes and I both agree that any proposal MUST have little and possibly no impact to existing access routines to management information. 3) Wes and I both agree that changes (which may be large) to agent and management code that encodes and decodes SNMP PDUs are acceptable and are expected. (That is, little gained by keeping PDU formats the same.) Regards, /david t. perkins