RE: Call for censensus on path forward
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A451D5E6F15FD211BABC0008C7FAD7BC0EFFE000@nl0006exch003u.nl.lucent.com> |
> Randy> I really don't see how the eos and the sming work (individually > Randy> or in concert) directly address the operator requirements, no > Randy> matter how interesting or valuable this work may be in its own > Randy> right. > > I think the working going forward does lay the foundation for > satisfying a large number of their demands. Ask me another day for a > detailed analysis, as I'm burnt out for this day. Please, whenever you feel better, please do send that detailed analysis. We need to explain/understand how we are (at least trying to) address the operator needs/demands/wants/requirements. Bert