RE: Recommendation on the path forward for EOS

My expectation is that these changes are best accommodated with a change to
the version, however, WG discussion may decide otherwise.

Cheers, /gww 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:31
> To: Waters, Glenn [CAR:IO47:EXCH]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Recommendation on the path forward for EOS
> 
> 
> > My recommendation is that the WG focus its efforts on the OOPS draft
> using
> > ideas from Dave Shield's and Dave Perkins' work as appropriate. I
> propose
> > that the WG develops the OOPS work as a standards track effort.
> 
> One question:
> 
>   Is it intended that this would be a new PDU within the existing
> SNMPv3/v3MP
> framework, or would we be expecting to define a new version at some level
> (either SNMPv4 or SNMPv3/v4MP) ?
> 
>   I thought I'd asked this last week, but the message doesn't seem to have
> made
> it to the list.  Wes (in a reply that also got lost?) seems to be thinking
> in
> terms of adding the OOPS PDUs to the existing SNMPv3/3MP - I'd like to
> check
> whether this is the general feeling, or whether the consensus would be for
> new
> PDUs to mean a new version.
> 
> 
> Dave