RE: IETF 55 EOS WG Minutes and Presentation
"Harrington, David" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6D745637A7E0F94DA070743C55CDA9BA4892EA@NHROCMBX1.ets.enterasys.com> |
Hi, I would love to see a number of Informational documents published about suggestions on how to utilize the data contained in existing standards-track mibs. Juergen, do you know students who would like to tackle such a task? I think I can get my company to provide some low-cost support for such an effort. dbh > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: IETF 55 EOS WG Minutes and Presentation > > > > >>>>> Sharon Chisholm writes: > > Sharon> The Oops ID has some interesting features, but how much these > Sharon> would get used in practice really depends on whether or not > Sharon> managers perceive it helps them with 3). If they are not > Sharon> convinced, then it's all for not. > > For the average polling engine, I guess new PDUs are rather useless. > If this is what we are worry about, then SNMP is done and we should > all let it rest in peace. > > If you write code that does some more intelligent operations (e.g. > checking the consistency of the IP/VLAN configuration on a larger > number of interconnected switches with many ports per switch, then the > efficiency of what we have today really forces you to fetch config > files or to script the CLI. > > Sure, making the protocol more efficient by putting some more > intelligence into the agent does not change existing applications nor > does it solve the problem that it is hard to find out what to do with > the MIB data. (The later problem can probably be solved by giving > students boxes to play with plus some support and you will be surprise > how creative some of these young people are. ;-) > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>