RE: Status of the WG

Hi Andy,

I didn't say we need to decide if it should be deployed for
configuration.
I said we need to decide if it should be deployed. 

If so, then we should provide guidance as to how this can be done, and
provide the necessary standardization to make it reasonably easy to do
so.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 12:37 AM
> To: Harrington, David
> Cc: Durham, David; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Sming (E-mail); Randy 
> Bush (E-mail); [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Status of the WG
> 
> 
> At 12:23 AM 2/14/2003 -0500, Harrington, David wrote:
> >As I said, we really need to decide whether we believe 
> SNMPv3 is worth the effort to help get it deployed. If not, 
> we should declare it Historic, pick an alternative, and move on. 
> 
> It's not that simple.  I think SNMP will continue to be used for
> monitoring for a long time.   I don't see it making any progress
> in configuration management, but that's my opinion.  Other people
> may find it perfect for their needs.
> 
> 
> >dbh
> 
> Andy
> 
>