Re: the future of SNMP

"Carl W. Kalbfleisch" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:33:04 -0600
Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.eos
Message-ID	<[email protected]>
--------------070209090209070507010503
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>[email protected] and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]


I believe that there is some need to do some additional protocol work to 
handle selective get/walk and configuration.

Carl

Wes Hardaker wrote:

>>>>>>On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:25 -0700, Bruce Shaw <[email protected]> said:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>Bruce> Yes.  My primary concern was that I don't want SNMP to fall by
>Bruce> the wayside - some of us still want to use it.
>
>I think Bert's more specific question was: do you want to see further
>development in the protocol itself, or just in the MIBs that are
>transferred over the protocol.
>
>  
>


--------------070209090209070507010503
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
<br>
I believe that there is some need to do some additional protocol work to
handle selective get/walk and configuration.<br>
<br>
Carl<br>
<br>
Wes Hardaker wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="[email protected]">
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <pre wrap="">On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:25 -0700, Bruce Shaw <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[email protected]">&lt;[email protected]&gt;</a> said:
            </pre>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
Bruce&gt; Yes.  My primary concern was that I don't want SNMP to fall by
Bruce&gt; the wayside - some of us still want to use it.

I think Bert's more specific question was: do you want to see further
development in the protocol itself, or just in the MIBs that are
transferred over the protocol.

  </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------070209090209070507010503--