Re: the future of SNMP

"Tom Petch" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:06:18 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.eos
Message-ID <013d01c2de95$b921f920$0301a8c0@tom3>
I am still waiting to see GetBulk used in anger but when I do, I
expect I will be disappointed at the performance and will want a
GetBulkExtended, sooner rather than later.

Tom Petch
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Hardaker <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Shaw <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]'
<[email protected]>
Date: 27 February 2003 10:10
Subject: Re: the future of SNMP


>>>>>> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:25 -0700, Bruce Shaw
<[email protected]> said:
>
>Bruce> Yes.  My primary concern was that I don't want SNMP to fall by
>Bruce> the wayside - some of us still want to use it.
>
>I think Bert's more specific question was: do you want to see further
>development in the protocol itself, or just in the MIBs that are
>transferred over the protocol.
>
>--
>Wes Hardaker
>Network Associates Laboratories
>