Re: the future of SNMP
"Tom Petch" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:06:18 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <013d01c2de95$b921f920$0301a8c0@tom3> |
I am still waiting to see GetBulk used in anger but when I do, I expect I will be disappointed at the performance and will want a GetBulkExtended, sooner rather than later. Tom Petch [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> To: Bruce Shaw <[email protected]> Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)' <[email protected]>; '[email protected]' <[email protected]> Date: 27 February 2003 10:10 Subject: Re: the future of SNMP >>>>>> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:30:25 -0700, Bruce Shaw <[email protected]> said: > >Bruce> Yes. My primary concern was that I don't want SNMP to fall by >Bruce> the wayside - some of us still want to use it. > >I think Bert's more specific question was: do you want to see further >development in the protocol itself, or just in the MIBs that are >transferred over the protocol. > >-- >Wes Hardaker >Network Associates Laboratories >