Re: the future of SNMP
Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:27:39 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Organization | Network Associates Laboratories |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:51:24 -0800 (PST), "B. Levin" <[email protected]> said: >> Which security >> precautions must be follwoed sending bulk responses >> to a noAuthNoPriv request? which are acceptable for >> an authPriv response? Can they be mixed into the >> same buffer? B> I don't have answers to those questions. I would B> welcome advice in making the mib more secure by those B> who are better qualified in the area of security. FYI, You might look at the DISMAN-EVENT-MIB or the DISMAN-SCRIPT-MIB (and probably others) which access internal agent objects by using the same security mechanisms that were used to create the activation row or object in the table in question. IE, before the data was shipped via ftp it must be gathered. When gathered, it is gathered using the same secName and secLevel as the original configuration object was set using. (this creates some problems, but it seems to be a commonly-in-use practice still). -- Wes Hardaker Network Associates Laboratories