RE: Question about IPv6 Management
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:48:32 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ipv6,gmane.ietf.v6ops,gmane.ietf.eos |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155012719C2@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2EC1E.EEDF5846 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" We have been defining a number of things so that IP (or better Internet) addresses can be represented in an IPversion neutral matter. See for example RFC3291. We are checking all MIB modules to be IPv4 and IPv6 capable (unless a module is for one specific IP version). We have defined TCs so that we also have IPv6 transport addresses so that SNMP can go over IPv6. See RFC3419 Various MIB modules are being reqorked in the IPv6 WG Hope this helps Thanks,Bert -----Original Message----- From: EricLKlein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: zondag 16 maart 2003 11:19 To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Question about IPv6 Management I appologize, this is being possted to multiple WG's as it seems to cross areas. Is there any information about the requirment changes in the Network Management Systems (NMS) or Operations Support Systems (OSS) necesary to support IPv6? I have looked at the various MIB RFC's and such, but can not find anything more than you need bigger address support and some SNMPv2 compliance. This seems too simple to me. Eric ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2EC1E.EEDF5846 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1255"> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.3502.5390" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>We have been defining a number of things so that IP (or better Internet) addresses</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>can be represented in an IPversion neutral matter. See for example RFC3291.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>We are checking all MIB modules to be IPv4 and IPv6 capable (unless a module</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>is for one specific IP version). </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>We have defined TCs so that we also have IPv6 transport addresses so that </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>SNMP can go over IPv6. See RFC3419</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>Various MIB modules are being reqorked in the IPv6 WG </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=337404315-16032003>Hope this helps</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <P><FONT size=2>Thanks,</FONT><FONT size=2>Bert </FONT></P> <BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"> <DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> EricLKlein [mailto:[email protected]]<BR><B>Sent:</B> zondag 16 maart 2003 11:19<BR><B>To:</B> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]<BR><B>Subject:</B> Question about IPv6 Management<BR><BR></DIV></FONT> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I appologize, this is being possted to multiple WG's as it seems to cross areas.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is there any information about the requirment changes in the Network Management Systems (NMS) or <FONT size=3>Operations Support Systems (OSS) necesary to support IPv6?</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>I have looked at the various MIB RFC's and such, but can not find anything more than you need bigger address support and some SNMPv2 compliance.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial>This seems too simple to me.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <FONT face=Arial size=2>Eric</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2EC1E.EEDF5846-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------