RE: multi: Re: Protocol operations proposal deadline / shield-eos -...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 19:01
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: multi: Re: Protocol operations proposal deadline / shield-eos-...

[...]
 
>   In the short run, I have no problems putting forward both smaller
>   and larger solutions, as long as the progress of the larger
>   solutions isn't impacted (IE, work must go forward quickly on a
>   bigger-simpler-easier-to-use global solution, and a delay can not be
>   incurred at this point while energy is focused only on short-term
>   solutions first).  IE, iff [sic] the WG has sufficient energy to
>   carry multiple proposals forward, this doesn't bother me in the
>   slightest if there is consensus to do so.

The WG has not had the cycles to produce one solution; as chair, working on
two solutions is a non-starter.

We need to pick a single solution and focus our energies on that solution.
We can utilize ideas from the other proposals as appropriate.

> Wes Hardaker
> Network Associates Laboratories

/gww