Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
Tony Hansen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of anything we removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document. So, just let us know of the implementations. Tony Hansen [email protected] "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote: > > My understanding is that the "dispatched" feature may be retained if > information can be provided to verify that there are interoperable > implementations. > Tamura-san is it possible to have two or more manufacturers document > interoperability of sending and receiving MDN with the dispatched feature? > > Lloyd > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Wing [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:22 PM > > To: Hiroshi Tamura; [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt > > > > > > > > > > Note that the requirements for draft standard are explicit that > > > all features > > > > and options need to have at least two, interoperable > > implementations. If > > > > they are still useful, the unimplemented dispositions > > deleted from this > > > > document may be standardized at a later date as an MDN extension. > > > > > > I do not read all, but I say, > > > > > > Some Ifax devices already use: > > > "dispatched" or "processed" without modifiers > > > when succesfully decoding the received TIFF-FX file > > > "processed/error" in the case of the failure. > > > > Those devices will remain compliant with the Proposed > > Standard RFC2298, > > but won't be compliant with the Draft Standard that Greg is authoring. > > > > > > As soon as Greg's document becomes an RFC, I'll ask our development > > group here in Cisco to bring our implementation in line with his > > new Draft Standard. > > > > -d > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent to you, since you are subscribed to > [email protected]. You can manage your subscription at > http://www.neystadt.org/cgi-bin/majordomo