RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt

Note we need vendors to both send _and_ receive the various 
permutations.  If all implementations only send and do not parse
or validate or do something on receipt, it doesn't pass muster
for Draft Standard.

-d

> -----Original Message-----
> From: McIntyre, Lloyd [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:11 AM
> To: 'Shibata Tetsuya'; '[email protected]'; McIntyre, Lloyd
> Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> 
> 
> I would like to add to the voices by expressing that Xerox products in the
> field do implement the dispatched feature as described by others.
> 
> Next steps is for us to get together and conduct a simple series of
> sends/receives between our implementations and document the outcome (e.g.
> successful/unsuccessful exchange, interpretation and identity of test
> partners). This documentation should then be provided to the WG 
> chair(s) who
> would submit it to the Area Director with the protocol action request.
> 
> Shibata, Iwazaki and Toyoda-san please let me know if you desire to make
> plans for testing. 
> 
> Lloyd
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shibata Tetsuya [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:27 AM
> > To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> > Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 
> > '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > 
> > 
> > I am a developer working at SHARP.
> > 
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: Tony Hansen [mailto:[email protected]]
> >  > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:24 AM
> >  > To: McIntyre, Lloyd
> >  > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> >  > Subject: Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D 
> > ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of 
> > anything we
> >  > removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document.
> >  > 
> >  > So, just let us know of the implementations.
> >  > 
> >  > 	Tony Hansen
> >  > 	[email protected]
> >  > 
> >  > "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote:
> > 
> > We have already developed the prototype which built in the 
> > "dispatched" feature.
> > 
> > We implemented almost the same as MGCS & TOSHIBA TEC.
> > 
> > "dispatched" without modifiers when succesfully decoding the 
> > received TIFF-FX file.
> > "processed/error" in the case of the failure.
> > 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> >  Tetsuya Shibata
> >  SHARP CORPORATION
> >