RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt

Dan,
Your comments are consistent with my expectations.
We need to start planning for realization.

Lloyd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wing [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:08 PM
> To: McIntyre, Lloyd; 'Shibata Tetsuya'; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> 
> 
> Note we need vendors to both send _and_ receive the various 
> permutations.  If all implementations only send and do not parse
> or validate or do something on receipt, it doesn't pass muster
> for Draft Standard.
> 
> -d
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McIntyre, Lloyd [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:11 AM
> > To: 'Shibata Tetsuya'; '[email protected]'; McIntyre, Lloyd
> > Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 
> '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > 
> > 
> > I would like to add to the voices by expressing that Xerox 
> products in the
> > field do implement the dispatched feature as described by others.
> > 
> > Next steps is for us to get together and conduct a simple series of
> > sends/receives between our implementations and document the 
> outcome (e.g.
> > successful/unsuccessful exchange, interpretation and 
> identity of test
> > partners). This documentation should then be provided to the WG 
> > chair(s) who
> > would submit it to the Area Director with the protocol 
> action request.
> > 
> > Shibata, Iwazaki and Toyoda-san please let me know if you 
> desire to make
> > plans for testing. 
> > 
> > Lloyd
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shibata Tetsuya [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:27 AM
> > > To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
> > > Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 
> > > '[email protected]'
> > > Subject: RE: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D 
> ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I am a developer working at SHARP.
> > > 
> > >  > -----Original Message-----
> > >  > From: Tony Hansen [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >  > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:24 AM
> > >  > To: McIntyre, Lloyd
> > >  > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> > >  > Subject: Re: [VPIM] RE: FW: I-D 
> > > ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-mdnbis-00.txt
> > >  > 
> > >  > 
> > >  > 
> > >  > Absolutely. If there ARE two (or more) implementations of 
> > > anything we
> > >  > removed, we'll put them back in to the updated MDN document.
> > >  > 
> > >  > So, just let us know of the implementations.
> > >  > 
> > >  > 	Tony Hansen
> > >  > 	[email protected]
> > >  > 
> > >  > "McIntyre, Lloyd" wrote:
> > > 
> > > We have already developed the prototype which built in the 
> > > "dispatched" feature.
> > > 
> > > We implemented almost the same as MGCS & TOSHIBA TEC.
> > > 
> > > "dispatched" without modifiers when succesfully decoding the 
> > > received TIFF-FX file.
> > > "processed/error" in the case of the failure.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > >  Tetsuya Shibata
> > >  SHARP CORPORATION
> > > 
>